Conceptualising the environmental dimension of left-behind places [Commentary]

Bez, Charlotte Sophia

doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108448

Item

ITEM ACTIONSEXPORT

Add to Basket

Local TagsRelease HistoryDetailsSummary

Released

Journal Article

Conceptualising the environmental dimension of left-behind places [Commentary]

Authors

/persons/resource/charlotte.sophia.bez

Bez, Charlotte Sophia
Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research;

External Ressource

No external resources are shared

Fulltext (public)

There are no public fulltexts stored in PIKpublic

Supplementary Material (public)

There is no public supplementary material available

Citation

Bez, C. S. (2025): Conceptualising the environmental dimension of left-behind places [Commentary]. - Ecological Economics, 228, 108448.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2024.108448

Cite as: https://publications.pik-potsdam.de/pubman/item/item_30684

Abstract

This analysis aims at conceptualising the environmental dimension of left-behind places. I argue that implementing environmental inequality concepts into economic geography is pivotal to sharpen the analysis of just transition geographies. Adopting such lens (1) helps to grasp the theoretical underpinnings of environmental inequalities, (2) lays bare the stratification of environmental risks in left-behind places, (3) helps overcome the environment-vs-jobs narrative. Overall, I lay out how environmental inequality exacerbates economic deprivation, together producing and reproducing left-behind places. Taken together, economic geography studies would profit from putting environmental inequality at its core. This conceptualisation has important policy implications around labour-focused just transitions.